Of the four Oct. 16 letters on issues in the U.S. presidential election, all alarmed me except the one by Milton Claassen, who supported Social Security and Medicare based on biblical principles of caring for the needy.
Of the four Oct. 16 letters on issues in the U.S. presidential election, all alarmed me except the one by Milton Claassen, who supported Social Security and Medicare based on biblical principles of caring for the needy.
I was upset to read the quote from Sam Hochstetler: “I feel no hatred, bitterness, anger, nor revenge towards the two Black men that murdered my daughter-in-law.”
Thank you for covering the tragic story of the Hochstetler family (Oct. 16) in Indiana. It has shaken this area with its several Amish and Mennonite communities.
As an American who has lived in Iran for over 30 years, I can testify that the Mennonite expression of radical love is deeply appreciated here in Iran.
I am excited about Anabaptist World’s new approach to holding us all together.
I was taught that the word “Anabaptist,” as a noun, had to do with a Reformation movement of the 16th century.
We will vote for the most pro-life candidate, because God hates the shedding of innocent blood (Proverbs 6:17).
In this historic year of seeking racial justice, some see parallels to the Civil Rights drama of 60 years ago.
How will we feel today if God raises up a ruler we have voted against?
People who advocate “Medicare for all” are accused of being socialists.
Ted Bergey’s Sept. 25 letter, “Both pro-life and pro-choice,” makes no logical or moral sense.
In the Nov. 3 elections, one issue outweighs all others: protecting the lives of unborn children.
